Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 00:07

Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
How scientists discovered 200-million-year-old species thought to be extinct - MSN
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Barbra Streisand on New Album, Not Being Paid Enough for Meet the Fockers - Variety
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
10 candidates who could fill the Dallas Stars’ head coaching vacancy - Dallas News
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sint temporibus laudantium dolore id ea aliquam.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Are there any penalties for bestiality in the USA and laws prohibiting it?
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
What’s next?
Russia can stop this any time.
Did Harry and Meghan really get what they wanted?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Blue Origin performs 12th crewed New Shepard suborbital flight - SpaceNews